Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation : The Pragmatics of Quotation and Reporting /

This book shows how research in linguistic pragmatics, philosophy of language, and rhetoric can be connected through argumentation to analyze a recognizably common strategy used in political and everyday conversation, namely the distortion of another s words in an argumentative exchange. Straw man a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Macagno, Fabrizio
Corporate Authors: SpringerLink Online service
Group Author: Walton, Douglas
Published: Springer International Publishing : Imprint: Springer,
Publisher Address: Cham :
Publication Dates: 2017.
Literature type: eBook
Language: English
Series: Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 14
Subjects:
Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62545-4
Summary: This book shows how research in linguistic pragmatics, philosophy of language, and rhetoric can be connected through argumentation to analyze a recognizably common strategy used in political and everyday conversation, namely the distortion of another s words in an argumentative exchange. Straw man argumentation refers to the modification of a position by misquoting, misreporting or wrenching the original speaker s statements from their context in order to attack them more easily or more effectively. Through 63 examples taken from different contexts (including political and forensic discourse
Carrier Form: 1 online resource (XVIII, 203 pages): illustrations.
ISBN: 9783319625454
Index Number: P99
CLC: H030
Contents: Introduction -- Using Quotations: Their Argumentative uses and Their Manipulations -- Communicative Intentions and Commitments -- Establishing Commitments between Ambiguity and Misquotation -- The Strategies of Misattribution of Commitments -- Evaluating Relevance and Commitments in Rhetorical Straw Man -- Commitment and Position -- A Procedure for Assessing Complex cases of Straw Man -- Conclusions -- Indices -- Cases.