How can conceptual content be social and normative, and, at the same time, be objective? /
In this book, Andrea Clausen intends to reconcile Kripke's point according to which conceptual content has to be considered as being constituted by social, normative practice - by a process of mutual assessments - with the view that the content of empirical assertions has to be conceived as obj...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | |
---|---|
Corporate Authors: | |
Published: |
De Gruyter,
|
Publisher Address: | Berlin/Boston : |
Publication Dates: |
[2008] ©2008 |
Literature type: | eBook |
Language: | English |
Series: |
Logos;
6 |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110324129 http://www.degruyter.com/doc/cover/9783110324129.jpg |
Summary: |
In this book, Andrea Clausen intends to reconcile Kripke's point according to which conceptual content has to be considered as being constituted by social, normative practice - by a process of mutual assessments - with the view that the content of empirical assertions has to be conceived as objective. She criticizes approaches that explicate content-constitutive practice in non-normative terms, namely in terms of sanctioning behavior (Haugeland, Pettit, Esfeld). She also rejects a pragmatist reading of Heidegger that proceeds from thoroughly normative but pre-conceptual practice. She develops and defends a particular reading of an approach that conceives normative, conceptually articulated practice - giving and asking for reasons - as primitive (Brandom, McDowell). |
Carrier Form: |
1 online resource (267 pages) : illustrations. Also available in print edition. |
ISBN: | 9783110324129 |
Index Number: | B731 |
CLC: | B087 |
Contents: |
Frontmatter -- Preface -- Table of contents -- Introduction -- 1. The objectivity of content -- 2. The normative and social character of content -- 3. A naturalistic answer -- 4. A pragmatist reading of Heidegger a middle position? -- 5. A primitivist answer -- Bibliography -- Backmatter. |