Screen LibraryAmerica responds to terrorism：conflict resolution strategies of Clinton, Bush, and Obama
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | |
|---|---|
| Published: |
Palgrave Macmillan,
|
| Publisher Address: | New York |
| Publication Dates: | 2011. |
| Literature type: | Book |
| Language: | English |
| Series: |
The evolving American presidency |
| Subjects: | |
| Carrier Form: | 276 p.: ; 22 cm. |
| ISBN: |
9780230623569 (hardback) 0230623565 (hardback) |
| Index Number: | D815 |
| CLC: | D815.5 |
| Call Number: | D815.5/F418 |
| Contents: |
Includes bibliographical references (p. [247]-265) and index. Includes bibliographical references and index. Machine generated contents note: One.Frame Theory -- Two.Presidential Frames of Terrorism -- Three.Framing Conflict Escalation: United States versus al Qaeda/Islamic Extremism -- Four.Framing the Terrorism Threat -- Five.Framing Terrorism Conflict Resolution -- Six.Framing Analysis: Evaluating Presidential Statements -- Seven.Bill Clinton: Conflict Avoidance Strategy -- Eight.George W. Bush: Fight-to-Win Strategy -- Nine.Barack Obama: Problem-Solving Strategy. "What policy is best for the United States to reduce the threat of Islamic extremist terrorism? Recent American presidents have applied alternative conflict resolution approaches. Clinton practiced conflict avoidance, talking tough but rarely retaliating against anti-American terrorist attacks. G. W. Bush adopted a fighter approach and the Global War on Terrorism and military interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq reflect this strategy. Obama introduced a third alternative: problem solving and extending peaceful overtures while keeping up resistance. Will the strategy succeed? Feste analyzes presidential rhetoric on counterterrorism policy through the lens of issue framing, enemy aggression, self -hardship, and victimization expressed in a variety of speeches delivered by these chief executives to highlight and compare their conflict resolution strategies"-- |