International dispute settlement room for innovations? /

This publication succeeds previously published seminars of the Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law (Heidelberg, Germany) dealing with evolving principles and new developments in international law. Due to the limits of traditional dispute settlement in international...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Corporate Authors: International Dispute Settlement: Room for Innovations Heidelberg, Germany); SpringerLink (Online service)
Group Author: Wolfrum, Rüdiger; Gätzschmann, Ina.
Published:
Literature type: Electronic eBook
Language: English
Series: Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht ; Bd. 239
Subjects:
Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34967-6
Summary: This publication succeeds previously published seminars of the Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law (Heidelberg, Germany) dealing with evolving principles and new developments in international law. Due to the limits of traditional dispute settlement in international law and the ongoing scholarly debate on those limits, it focuses on possible innovations and functional approaches to improve international dispute settlement mechanisms. In doing so, it covers a wide variety of topics such as procedures of the WTO ...
Carrier Form: 1 online resource (xiv, 445 p.)
Bibliography: Includes bibliographical references.
ISBN: 9783642349676 (electronic bk.)
3642349676 (electronic bk.)
Index Number: JZ6010
CLC: D994-532
Contents: Panel I: What makes the WTO dispute settlement procedure particular: lessons to be learned for the settlement of international disputes in general? -- Panel II: Advisory opinions: are they a suitable alternative for the settlement of international disputes? -- Panel III: Interaction between counsel and international courts and arbitral tribunals: ethical standards for counsel -- Panel IV: International courts as lawmakers -- Panel V: Privatization of settlement of international disputes.